Even though it’s a well known fact that the UK is currently very low in its stocks of blood, which means the NHS is forced to spend taxpayers’ money on advertising and marketing in order to save lives, there are several million potential (and willing) donors currently being ignored.
If the NHS changed one simple rule, it could potentially have several million extra donors eligible to give blood - instantly and without any marketing costs, simply by allowing gay people to give blood.
This would allow several million more men to be eligible to give blood – and would further safeguard blood stock levels.
Most people are unaware that a gay man is not allowed to give blood even if he has only ever had protected sex with one other man - however, a straight man who has had unprotected sex with dozens of women, is accepted.
But now a new group has been set up to fight this double standard. The BloodBan.co.uk campaign has been founded to protest against the ban on gay blood donors within the UK. “We just don’t see the sense in this hypocrisy that is being perpetrated,” commented Russell Hirst, founder of the BloodBan.co.uk campaign. “So we’re asking people to visit our website: www.bloodban.co.uk and sign our petition - we will be sending it to the NHS, National Blood Service chief executive and the Prime Minister later this year.
“The NHS National Blood Service has told us that its reasons
for banning gay people from becoming blood donors come down to cost. Their opinion is that blood from a gay person is more likely to be infected than blood from a straight person. Therefore, they say,
the costs of screening gay blood are too high.
”
“However, surely the costs will be lower than running a national advertising campaign? And why are the costs of screening a straight person’s blood acceptable when sexually transmitted diseases among heterosexuals rise every year? Further more, we believe that the opinions of the NHS regarding gay donors are out-dated and do not reflect current statistics”
“We think there is one simple solution though, which will both reduce the level
of discrimination against gay people and limit the extra costs on the NHS:
Allow gay people to give blood, but ask the donor to have key tests performed
first - bringing the certificate of 'all clear' with them when giving blood.
It's not ideal and still discriminates, but it goes some way to solving the problem of low blood stocks – and ultimately, could save lives.
“Obviously we'd much rather prefer that the ban was dropped completely - therefore dramatically increasing the number of potential donors, increasing blood stocks, stopping this discrimination and reducing the marketing spend too.”
Anyone wishing for more information, or to sign the petition, should visit www.bloodban.co.uk
Recent Comments